What is TaskStream and how do you submit a WGU assessment?
TaskStream is the platform WGU uses for performance assessments — the written and applied work you submit, as opposed to proctored exams. You upload your document there, and anonymous evaluators select it, open the analytic rubric aligned to the course competencies, and judge it aspect by aspect.
They return comments against each aspect that did not clear. They do not assign an overall score, and they do not enter a conversation with you.
What actually happens after you press submit
- Your work enters a queue. It is not assigned to a teacher who knows you; an evaluator selects it.
- The evaluator opens the same rubric you were given. This is the part worth internalising — nothing is being judged that you were not told about in advance.
- Each aspect is marked independently. Competent, or not.
- If every aspect clears, the task passes. There is no distinction between clearing narrowly and clearing brilliantly.
- If any aspect does not, the whole task returns with comments on that aspect.
How to submit work that clears first time
The single most effective habit costs about twenty minutes: before you write anything, copy the rubric aspects into your document as headings. Write to each one in turn. Delete the headings at the end if you like the prose to flow, but write against the structure you will be judged against.
Nurses who do this pass considerably more often, not because their writing improves but because they stop accidentally omitting an aspect. Omission, not weakness, is the most common reason a competent nurse gets work returned.
Before you upload, check these
- Every aspect addressed explicitly. If an aspect asks for a barrier analysis, the words need to be on the page. An evaluator cannot award something you implied.
- Sources meet the stated requirements. Currency and type are usually specified and are an easy avoidable fail.
- Correct file format and length. Mechanical, and mechanical failures still return the task.
- Your own work. Originality checking is routine, and a violation is a different and more serious category of problem than a returned task.
When it comes back
Read only the comments on the aspects that failed and change only those. Rewriting a whole submission after a single aspect was flagged is common, wasteful, and occasionally introduces a new problem in a section that had already passed.
Related questions
How long does WGU take to grade a performance assessment?
Can you resubmit a failed performance assessment?
Can you talk to the evaluator?
Is TaskStream the same as the WGU student portal?
Had work returned and unsure what they wanted?
Usually the answer is in the aspect comments and easier to read with someone else looking at it. Happy to help.
Talk to us